For the first time since 2010, a Republican has introduced a climate bill – and business leaders have been quick to welcome his market-based approach for fighting climate change.
Last week, 34 companies in the United States sent a public letter thanking Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida for introducing the MARKET CHOICE Act, H.R. 6463, a bill to fund infrastructure investment while cutting climate pollution.
Companies that signed the letter applauding Rep. Corbelo's leadership include BP America, Campbell Soup Company, The Dow Chemical Company, DuPont, General Motors, Ingersoll Rand, Lyft, Inc., IKEA North America Services, LLC, National Grid, PG&E Corporation and Shell.
Meanwhile, the Sustainable Food Policy Alliance – which includes Danone, Mars, Nestle USA and Unilever – sent its own letter of support.
Why did these companies publicly thank Rep. Curbelo and his co-sponsors? Here are four takeaways for companies of all sizes.
1. Companies recognize the MARKET CHOICE Act is a big deal
Businesses are way ahead of Washington, D.C. when it comes to addressing climate change, which has regrettably become a partisan issue that Congress hasn't touched in years. The MARKET CHOICE Act could begin to change that.
As the companies write in their letter, "this issue impacts our employees, our customers and the communities that we serve regardless of political affiliation – and of course, it impacts our businesses in very direct ways." Whether or not this bill passes the House or even comes to a vote, its introduction is a significant step forward in building momentum for climate action in Congress.
2. Companies want market-based solutions to climate change
Their letter points out that the most effective way to fight climate change is to harness market forces to drive down emissions.
"We believe that an economy-wide, market-based approach to valuing or pricing carbon, when carefully crafted, can both strengthen our economy and reduce carbon emissions by encouraging technological innovation and stimulating new investments in infrastructure, products and services," the companies write. They also highlight that a market-based approach "provides much-needed certainty to aid us in making long-term investment decisions that can further mitigate climate-related risks."
While they aren't endorsing this specific bill, the companies commend Rep. Curbelo for using a market-based approach and make the key point that "valuing or pricing carbon and strengthening our economy are not mutually exclusive – something we, as businesses, have understood for many years."
Lawmakers who voted yes on the Scalise resolution – which denounces carbon taxes as "detrimental to the economy" – might want to listen to what these businesses have to say.
3. These companies know that their influence matters
Businesses know that any lasting and effective solution to climate change will require bipartisan support, and that they have a critical role to play in securing that support. By publicly commending lawmakers who introduce climate bills, companies can create the political space for others – on both sides of the aisle – to do the same.
Moreover, as key stakeholders in climate and energy policies, businesses can't afford to stay on the sidelines. They know their sustained engagement is critical for advancing, improving and ultimately passing legislation that achieves the winning combination of driving down greenhouse gas emissions and improving our economy.
Business influence is a vast and largely untapped resource for moving climate legislation forward and we need many more companies to get involved.
4. Their stakeholders expect nothing less
Finally, these companies recognize that while their voluntary actions to cut carbon emissions are important, leadership requires constructive engagement in public policy.
Publicly supporting proposals to price carbon shows customers, employees and investors that you are walking the talk on sustainability, and aligning your public rhetoric with your policy advocacy.
It should be a no-brainer for the more than 430 companies that have set science-based targets to cut their emissions, the nearly 140 have committed to be powered 100 percent by renewable energy or the nearly 2,000 businesses and investors that have signed on to We Are Still In.
We join these leading businesses in commending Rep. Curbelo for introducing his innovative proposal. Now is the time for more companies across the U.S. to do the same.
Get innovation updates
We'll send regular updates about developments in technology, science and the environment.
It strikes me that companies are more likely to join forces in bringing down emissions and doing this in a way to improve the economy. This obviously was President George W. Bush’s biggest problem — fouling the economy prematurely. Only a programmed plan can effectively do these things:
1. Reduce that matches with the weaning of Customers off fossil fuels and onto renewables, possibly in an evoled way of switching (or substituting) one temporary solution until time allows another gain in emission reduction with yet another solution all can participate in.
2. As the successes build up, more opportunities become accessible.
3. The fossil fuel tax having monthly dividends “control” problem is dropped out of consideration and allows companies to soft pedal in a way that our economy improves rather than being sacrificed, litterally.
4. At each interval with emissions reduction, it will seem as a shared race to achieve success without interruptions. That’s the word that these “fixer uppers” can just take off the table right now!!!
What’s the hold-up? Only by getting people to all come together, which this plan (bill) does, will bring about a great success story! The awards will, therefore, include every one as a “fixer upper!”
A real team spirit is brought about, I’ll say!! Thanks go out to everyone who has move the golf ball closer to the hole on or below par!
Don ManningJuly 31, 2018 at 7:19 pm