Callie Eideberg: Growing Returns
How Congress can ensure voluntary carbon markets work for farmers and the environment
Three policy priorities to make voluntary carbon markets work for the climate and agriculture.
The post How Congress can ensure voluntary carbon markets work for farmers and the environment first appeared on Growing Returns.Top 5 priorities for USDA to support climate-smart farms and forests
Guided by science, USDA can help harness the power of farms and forests to build climate resilience for all.
The post Top 5 priorities for USDA to support climate-smart farms and forests first appeared on Growing Returns.3 ways the Growing Climate Solutions Act will help farmers and rural communities thrive
Why both sides of the aisle, along with farmers and environmentalists, see such potential for agricultural climate solutions.
The post 3 ways the Growing Climate Solutions Act will help farmers and rural communities thrive first appeared on Growing Returns.Farmers and environmentalists team up to push Congress to act on climate
3 ways Congress can drive climate-smart practices on America’s farms, ranches and forests
The post Farmers and environmentalists team up to push Congress to act on climate first appeared on Growing Returns.Corn farmers endorsed climate policies. Here’s what you need to know.
The National Corn Growers Association policies show that U.S. farmers want to address the climate risk that already impacts them.
The post Corn farmers endorsed climate policies. Here’s what you need to know. first appeared on Growing Returns.Congress just took two actions to boost climate resilience in agriculture
These policies can help farmers thrive in a changing climate. And they have bipartisan support.
The post Congress just took two actions to boost climate resilience in agriculture first appeared on Growing Returns.3 must-haves for USDA to cut agriculture’s environmental footprint in half
This is a critical moment for USDA to spur faster adoption of agricultural conservation practices that reduce climate risks to food production.
The post 3 must-haves for USDA to cut agriculture’s environmental footprint in half first appeared on Growing Returns.How the farm bill changes the future of climate and water conservation
This farm bill addresses conservation issues that aren't bound by a single farm's borders.
The post How the farm bill changes the future of climate and water conservation first appeared on Growing Returns.5 reasons why the Senate farm bill is a conservation powerhouse
Within the bill’s 1,200 pages are big advances for the environment, technology and innovation.
The post 5 reasons why the Senate farm bill is a conservation powerhouse first appeared on Growing Returns.What to watch for during today’s farm bill markup in the House
While much of the focus will be on the Conservation Stewardship Program and the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, here are six additional conservation items to keep an eye on during markup.
The post What to watch for during today’s farm bill markup in the House first appeared on Growing Returns.The farm bill can make the ag data revolution a reality
The next farm bill can jump-start agricultural conservation. Here’s how.
Conservation technical assistance should not get lost in the shuffle
Why Sonny Perdue should prioritize these 3 farm programs
How my passion for food and history led me to the Farm Bill
How Congress can help farmers stay profitable and resilient
Farmers are helping to heal the Chesapeake Bay, but they can’t do it alone
By Callie Eideberg
Callie Eideberg, EDF's new senior policy manager for sustainable agriculture.
We often hear about the deep-rooted water quality challenges in the Chesapeake Bay, and how not enough progress is being made. While agriculture, urban/suburban runoff, vehicle emissions, and other sources share responsibility for the bay’s poor health, all too often farmers shoulder most of the blame.
Earlier this month, USDA released the Chesapeake Bay Progress Report, which revealed that since 2009, federal investments helped area farmers implement nearly $1 billion worth of conservation practices on more than 3.5 million acres and install nearly 3,500 miles of riparian buffers that reduce nutrient runoff into waterways. Between 2006 and 2011, farmer efforts reduced sediment loss by 15.1 million tons per year.
This is encouraging news, and part of the reason the overall health of the bay is improving. Supporting farmers and their livelihoods is key to solving the watershed’s environmental challenges. As the report notes, “a thriving and sustainable agricultural sector is critical to restoring the bay.”
There is still a lot of work to do. Because a significant increase in public funding is unlikely, relying too heavily on federal investment in voluntary conservation programs is not a good pathway to fully heal the bay.
Here are two ways that agriculture can further accelerate improvements in the watershed.
Support private sector momentum
Photo courtesy of SUSTAIN.
Private sector commitments to sustainable agriculture are on the rise. Environmental Defense Fund is working with Campbell Soup Company, Kellogg, Walmart, Unilever, Smithfield Foods, and through Land O’Lakes’ SUSTAIN® platform to help companies set and achieve sustainable sourcing goals and support farmers through tangible, economically smart improvements to their farming operations.
Getting the food sector on board is a game changer for agricultural sustainability, but if we don’t align key federal policies with this unprecedented supply chain momentum, we will hit roadblocks that will compromise progress and alienate stakeholders.
Federal policy has not kept pace with private sector innovation. One example is advances in precision agriculture. In many cases, federal programs encourage farmers to adopt older practices that are often less effective in reducing fertilizer losses or improving soil health, failing to provide farmers with access to more advanced tools for improving efficiency.
Keeping up with innovation would enable current federal investments to deliver far greater environmental benefits. It is time to have federal policies accelerate market demand for agricultural conservation instead of slow it down.
Increase impact of current programs
Credit: Chesapeake Bay Program
As the USDA report suggests, federal conservation programs have been successful in helping to reduce nutrient loading into the bay. But they can be even more effective by making a few adjustments, such as:
- Improving targeting of federal funds to the most important places and practices (e.g., the watersheds in most need of restoration).
- Streamlining program delivery and execution by reducing inefficient contracting requirements.
- Improving collaboration between USDA and the private sector advisors that work with the vast majority of U.S. farmers (ag retail, agronomists, etc.).
These changes will enable federal programs to better meet the needs of farmers and agribusinesses, resulting in more conservation on the ground.
With additional investments in innovation and collaboration with the private sector, we can return Chesapeake Bay to its former glory.