Pruitt rules EPA under a cloak of secrecy. Here's why you should care.

Martha Roberts

The imposing limestone government building in central Washington where Scott Pruitt holds sway is increasingly operating away from public view with decisions made behind closed doors, once-public information blacked out, and influential insiders taking charge.

As the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pruitt has also proven elusive, having spent more than half of his days away from Washington amid speculation he’s really focused on a future run for Oklahoma senator or governor. His frequent travel to the Midwestern state at taxpayers’ expense recently prompted the agency’s Inspector General to open an investigation – and yet, Pruitt has found time to quietly and systematically tear down policies that protect our health and safety.

Here are the five most glaring examples of the EPA chief’s pattern of secrecy, and what it means for you.

1. Suppressed web pages about climate change

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, my organization recently received EPA records detailing more than 1,900 items that had been modified or deleted from the agency’s website since President Trump’s inauguration day – including information about how climate change affects children and pregnant women. 

2. Keeps his schedule secret

Pruitt is hiding from the public even the most basic information about how he spends his business hours and with whom. Contravening a bi-partisan EPA transparency practice, Pruitt no longer makes any senior management calendars – including his own – available to the public. Americans have a right to know how a high-ranking, taxpayer-funded public servant spends his time and makes decisions that directly affect their lives.

3. Suspends pollution laws without public input

Over the past six months, Pruitt has taken actions to suspend environmental safeguards without providing any opportunity for public input – including protections against toxic wastewater, oil and gas pollution as well as climate pollution.

Among one of Pruitt’s earliest actions was to suspend, without any public input, protections against safety risks at major chemical facilities. Just a few months later, the Houston-area Arkema plant exploded after Hurricane Harvey flooded the site. 

4. Attacks reporter covering the EPA

Pruitt’s press team lashed out against an Associated Press journalist after he co-authored a report that exposed the EPA’s absence at Superfund sites flooded after Hurricane Harvey. The agency’s press release attacked the reporter without rebutting any of the article’s factual findings, raising concerns about the politicization of press coverage when public safety is at stake.

5. Rolls back enforcement against polluters

Under Trump’s administration, the EPA has quietly but dramatically reduced enforcement against polluters. So far, the agency has collected 60 percent less in civil penalties than previous administrations did during their first six months in office, a recent analysis by the Environmental Integrity Project found.

Not holding companies responsible for their pollution has tangible impacts in the form of more pollution, more illness and more avoidable early deaths among Americans like you and me.

As someone ‘taking a meat ax to the protections of public health and environment and then hiding it.’

So covert is Pruitt that he earned the Golden Padlock Award this summer from investigative reporters and editors who recognize the most secretive United States agency or individual. The judges were impressed by “the breadth and scope of Pruitt’s information suppression techniques around vital matters of public interest.”

Indeed, looking at the rapid transformation of the agency he led during the Nixon and Reagan administrations, former EPA Administrator Bill Ruckelshaus described Pruitt’s first six months as someone “taking a meat ax to the protections of public health and environment and then hiding it.”

Pruitt’s efforts to hollow out the EPA and weaken the public health safeguards that the agency is required to uphold is why we’re mobilizing, like never before, to protect and defend America’s clean air and water.

Public opinion and, increasingly, the courts are on our side, but we cannot let up the fight for the future of our children and grandchildren at this critical time.

Comments

We need a serious environmental advocate as head of the EPA. Someone who will stand up to big corporations. Not a corporate insider who cozies up to his former colleagues. The future is in our hands, how do we want our legacy to be?

Natasha Thomas
December 9, 2017 at 4:20 pm

How can he be stopped? He needs to be sued! He sued the EPA 14 times; [now] lets sue him until he is behind bars.

Kelly Boyle
December 10, 2017 at 11:31 am

This is total bullshit!! I’m so mad! Glad I don’t have children, if I did I would be looking for a lawyer for the future! If there is one??

Tara Mcgavan
December 12, 2017 at 2:26 pm

Stop Ken Pruitt

Cecilia Height
December 19, 2017 at 12:46 am

Secret work environment is usually a bad thing. We need to know whats going on, with whom and what the positive goal is. This crap of secrecy is not acceptable and the public needs to know. Pruitt needs to be held accountable for trips unrelated to his EPA position.

Marlene West
January 2, 2018 at 11:59 pm

Would be good to post running roll of conflicted Pruitt hires, adding to EDF Keith Gaby's shortlist. Where is the EPA Ethics council on these hires?

Center for Public Integrity has a list of 46 appointees that previously worked for fossil fuel energy sector, chemical lobby/interest groups,
climate change-denying 'think tanks' and lobbying groups:

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2017/11/09/21275/behind-scenes-look-sco…

theresa
January 11, 2018 at 10:39 pm

The EPA is supposed to be an agency that "protects" the environment which in turn protects the people of our country. The agency should report what it is doing to help our environment. All we are seeing, is what is being taken away from the protection of our environment making it and us vulnerable to a toxic environment.

Kathleen
January 12, 2018 at 10:58 am

Why is he allowed to operate in this fashion? Where are the safeguards to stop this abuse of power? He needs to be performing the duties of this position, not redefining what those obligations are. This entire administration is a train run off the tracks. I am in utter disbelief that it continues to escalate without any stop checks; boggles the mind that this country has been taken hostage by corporate interest with no resistance…so disappointing!!

Colleen munroe
January 18, 2018 at 1:09 pm

He is a disgrace to our people, our country and the world. He has no experience required to take on the job he holds. He has no scientific knowledge about what’s going on with our world’s climate, nor does he care to enlighten himself on the subject. He is blinded by the dollar as are most of this administration. Get him out. Put someone who actually cares about the environment as the leader of the Environmental Protection Agency, not someone who had tried to sue, multiple times mind you, the agency that fights to protect our clean water, fresh air and the environment we all must share.

Paige
January 20, 2018 at 11:00 pm

Lets be honest. The EPA is now the Fossil Fuel Promotion Agency and the Scott Pruitt Campaign Fund.

Christine Lubimir
January 20, 2018 at 11:59 pm

What evidence is necessary to sue Pruitt and what causes of action would be appropriate/effective? All the wringing of hands is spending precious energy and time! Is there a legal expert on this? Let’s move on it. With a clear vision and course of action, people can then start taking steps to get the job done. Thank you for bringing it to our attention, now let’s get going. By the way, I think he should be sued individually for damages as well as officially for removal and injunctions etc. Would that be practicable?

Mary C. Delany
February 11, 2018 at 12:39 pm

Add new comment

Required
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Required
Required