EPA's Naming of Formaldehyde as a Candidate for High Priority Under TSCA Raises Serious Concerns
Statement of Dr. Richard Denison, Lead Senior Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund
“EPA’s statement today regarding its inclusion of formaldehyde on the list of chemicals under consideration for prioritization for risk evaluation under TSCA leaves many questions unanswered.
EPA states that ‘the work done for IRIS will inform the TSCA process.’ Such consideration is already required by law.
What is absolutely essential is that the IRIS program be able to complete its assessment of formaldehyde, which has been suppressed for the last year and a half by conflicted EPA political appointees. Then EPA’s TSCA office, just like every other EPA office, can and should rely on it to make regulatory decisions.It’s time that political interference in the agency’s science stop.”
- Dr. Richard Denison, Lead Senior Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund
For more information see the following EDF blog post: The Trump EPA’s actions on formaldehyde can be summed up in one word: Corrupt
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Media Contact
Latest press releases
-
Environmental Defense Fund announces first grantees in SRM research program
March 2, 2026 -
Apple Watch carbon neutral court ruling sets guardrails for greenwashing litigation
February 26, 2026 -
New Proposal in Congress Would Gut Key Provisions of Landmark Chemical Safety Law, Putting Families’ Health at Risk
February 26, 2026 -
Rejoining RGGI is a Huge Win for Virginia Climate and Communities
February 26, 2026 -
New Report: Arizona’s Power Companies Could Save Customers $114M per Year
February 23, 2026 -
Massachusetts Takes Major Step to Reduce Energy Burdens for Low Income Residents
February 20, 2026