World's Largest Lending Agencies Finance Environmental Destruction, Widespread Corruption

March 25, 1999

(25 March, 1999 — Washington) An international coalition of environment and development organizations today launched a campaign to reform export finance agencies that support private sector projects in developing countries. The group’s report, A Race To the Bottom: Creating Risk, Generating Debt and Guaranteeing Environmental Destruction, profiles a sample of the environmental and social negligence of these export finance agencies.

Export credit agencies (ECAs) and investment insurance organizations are together the world’s largest public international finance institutions, subsidizing more than 10 percent of world trade. In 1997 they approved more than $105 billion in new loans, guarantees and insurance, more than half of which went for large infrastructure projects in developing countries. Their mandate is to subsidize private sector exports and investment abroad. While bilateral aid agencies and multilateral development institutions, such as the World Bank, have adopted detailed social and environmental procedures, the more obscure ECAs have few, and often times no environmental or social standards.

Among all international financial agencies, ECAs are the least transparent, not even sharing key information on their operations with other ECAs and international institutions such as the World Bank. “Export credit agencies finance projects?many riddled with corruption—that other taxpayer-supported agencies reject as environmentally and economically unsustainable,” said Bruce Rich, Senior Attorney with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).

“These agencies are providing corporate welfare and financing environmental destruction worldwide with public money,” said Jon Sohn, Policy Analyst with Friends of the Earth, U.S.

The impact of ECA-funded projects on local communities, human rights and the environment in many countries is devastating. “We in Indonesia want the taxpayers of the industrialized world to stop subsidizing the expropriation of our land, the destruction of our environment, and the ruination of public health through ECA projects that their country’s own aid agencies and the World Bank would reject,” said Titi Soentoro, of Bioforum, Indonesia, representing a coalition of some 70 Indonesian non-governmental groups.

“We await long overdue reforms in Germany that the new government promised in its coalition agreement,” said Heffa Schuecking, who represents a coalition of over 100 church, development and environmental groups that are calling for environmental and social accountability in the German export credit agency Hermes. “We call upon the German government to become a leader in international efforts to set standards to halt the taxpayer-subsidized havoc caused by these agencies.”

Race to The Bottom provides a series of fifteen country and project case studies exploring the gross environmental and social negligence of these publicly-owned institutions. Among them:

Ilisu Hydroelectric Dam, Turkey: Several ECAs are considering extending about $850 million in export credits and guarantees for this project. Damming the Tigris near the Iraqi and Syrian borders, the project in the heart of a militarily occupied Kurdish area will enable Turkey to block flows of the Tigris to Iraq for several months, further exacerbating the current turmoil characterizing the region. Ilisu will flood 52 villages, 15 small towns, and evict the 5,500 inhabitants of Hasankeyf, drowning the best preserved medieval town in Anatolia, a legally protected archaeological and cultural site. It will forcibly displace an estimated 15,000 mainly Kurdish refugees. It violates five policy guidelines of the World Bank on 18 accounts, and core provisions of the UN Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of Transboundary Watercourses, which Turkey has opposed.