Main U.S. Toxics Law Failing to Ensure Safety of Thousands of Chemicals
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Washington , DC – February 26, 2009) Congress urgently needs to reform the nation’s main chemicals law, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976, because it has failed to ensure the safety of the tens of thousands of chemicals in commercial use and development. That is the conclusion of expert testimony provided at a hearing held today in the U.S. House of Representatives by a scientist who recently advised the toxics office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
“It doesn’t take a scientist to realize that the Toxic Substances Control Act is badly broken,” said Dr. Richard A. Denison, a senior scientist at Environmental Defense Fund and former member of the EPA’s National Pollution Prevention and Toxics Advisory Committee (NPPTAC). “The now-daily barrage of headlines about the dangers posed by yet another chemical used in common consumer products – like the toxic flame retardants used in furniture that virtually all Americans now carry in their bodies – is a direct manifestation of the utter failure of our current chemicals policy.”
“Congress needs to act now, lest the United States risk falling further behind the rest of the developed world, which has already taken steps to ensure the safety of the chemicals and chemical products we make and use every day,” noted Denison. “Without prompt action, we also risk becoming a dumping ground for unsafe products produced elsewhere in the world.”
Citing EPA’s inability to use TSCA to restrict even highly dangerous chemicals such as asbestos and formaldehyde, Denison ’s testimony enumerated the law’s key structural flaws, including that it:
- Fails to provide EPA with adequate authority to require companies to test their chemicals so that unsafe – as well as safer – chemicals can be identified;
- Forbids EPA from sharing much of the limited chemical information it does obtain; and
- Imposes an essentially impossible burden on EPA to prove actual harm before it can initiate any action to control or replace a dangerous chemical.
“Our outmoded policy is directly responsible for perpetuating a chemicals economy that is dysfunctional, ill-informed and unable to distinguish a dangerous chemical from a safe one,” concluded Denison . “A top-to-bottom overhaul of the Toxic Substances Control Act is essential to establish a market that is driven by knowledge rather than ignorance and uncertainty, and that rewards innovation toward safer chemicals and products.”
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Latest press releases
-
Pennsylvania takes important step toward statewide methane standards
July 24, 2026 -
National alliance urges Congress to reject industry efforts to weaken nation’s chemical safety law
July 23, 2026 -
Statement: EPA should withdraw proposal that would erase public notice and comment for air pollution permits
July 22, 2026 -
Trump EPA Administrator to coal executives: “Many of the items that were on your wish list are now done.”
July 21, 2026 -
EDF, Gridworks report confirms intervenor compensation can strengthen utility commission decision-making
July 20, 2026 -
Statement: In victory for clean air, judge orders EPA to implement protections from soot
July 18, 2026