5 ways chemical safety is eroding under Trump

Richard Denison

Editor’s note: This post was updated on July 23, 2018.

In June 2016, Congress had the rare success of passing bipartisan legislation to update our nation’s badly broken chemical safety system. It finally gave the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the power to strengthen health protections for American families.

Fast-forward 25 months and the implementation of that law is now in jeopardy.

The Trump administration is systematically weakening the EPA and seeking to dismantle key new authorities and mandates Congress just gave it under the reformed Toxic Substances Control Act. This with the goal of shifting critical policies to serve the chemical industry’s agenda instead of protecting public health.

Here are five actions Trump’s handpicked political appointees have already taken to undermine the law – potentially setting us back decades.

1. Shelved proposed bans of 3 toxic chemicals

In January 2017, the EPA proposed to ban high-risk uses of three dangerous chemicals: methylene chloride, N-methylpyrrolidone and trichloroethylene. Methylene chloride, for one, is used in widely available paint strippers and is responsible for dozens of deaths in recent years.

Less than a year later, with a new president in the White House, the EPA has delayed action, two of them indefinitely, on these chemicals by moving the proposed bans from active to “long-term action” status. This effectively puts them on the back burner, going against the very spirit and goal of the 2016 chemical safety reform.

2. Issued new and illegal rules for TSCA

One of the first orders of business under the 2016 Lautenberg Act was for the EPA to issue “framework rules” governing how the reformed law will work for years to come.

The proposed rules – released at the tail end of the Obama administration – were fair and faithful to the law. But the final rules published in July 2017 did a U-turn from those that had been proposed and now reflect the wish list of the chemical industry.

They are also patently illegal, which is why we’re suing the EPA.

3. Reversed course on new and existing chemical reviews

After the new law passed, the EPA immediately began to conduct the more robust reviews of new chemicals before they entered the market that the legislation called for. It also planned to conduct broad reviews of all uses of chemicals already in commerce. 

But in response to industry demands, the EPA reversed course to instead avoid robust reviews of new and existing chemicals that would more likely lead to more protective measures.

These changes circumvent clear requirements in the law and essentially return America to an era where few chemicals were adequately assessed or tested for safety as a condition of entering or staying on the market. Meanwhile, the public has been kept in the dark.

4. …and two more actions setting us back

The administration’s strategy for undermining chemical safety has two more components that – while not directly related to the 2016 chemical safety law – further achieve this objective.

By targeting key EPA programs through “reorganization” or budget cuts, and by stacking the agency with industry cronies, the Trump administration is crippling implementation and enforcement of environmental and public health laws. This is sadly consistent with its overall goal of elevating industry interests over the protection of our health.

Get policy and political updates

Friday digests from our staff keep you up to date on the week’s events.

Thanks for subscribing to In case you missed it

Comments

Add #6: defunding open data initiatives that allowed scientists, within federal and regional EPA offices, as well as university and civil society organizations, to access linked open datasets. By defunding programs introduced under the prior administration, such as https://opendata.epa.gov, they are making it harder to programmatically access human and machine readable data.

The linked open data that was a year old when published in 2016 — including Facilties (toxic) Substances, Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), RCRA Handlers and CRC linked open data).

This data [was] technically made available under the new environmental data gateway on May 30, 2018, however no new linked open data [was] created by EPA’s Office of Environmental Informatio). This is a step backwards in modernizing open government data and making federally funded science and environmental data available to the public.

Bernadette
May 26, 2018 at 6:04 pm

Couldn’t say it better.

G Lee
June 15, 2018 at 4:21 pm

In reply to by Bernadette

It's important to me and my family that the EPA and my government protect the American people from chemical companies being allowed to put out products that have proven harmful to the public's health. We need you to do your job. America has the weakest chemical laws of any industrialized nation on this plants. Put the public's best interest over profits!!!

Liinda Tift
June 5, 2018 at 2:14 pm

It's unbelievable ! Never did I expect these kinds of things happening. No warnings in debates that i recall! Infuriating!!!

Paula Dollins
August 4, 2018 at 4:55 pm

Trump has no regard for the safety of the people. It will take years to undo the harm he is responsible for and to get rid of those he has put in place.

Barbara Murphy
August 5, 2018 at 6:32 am

In their rush to capitalize from the idiocy that is the complete public works of the Trump administration, the press overlooks the more dangerous items. When focusing on what Trump says, the press overlooks what laws and deregulations generated by his cabinet are doing to our environment. That is the real story and would get more attention if the press showed the American people what Trump is really doing to this country.

Jonathan Hodges
August 9, 2018 at 4:03 pm

Add new comment

Required
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Required
Required