Senate Falls Short on Effort To Block Clean Air Rollback
(22 January, 2003 — Washington, DC) Environmental Defense today expressed disappointment in a U.S. Senate vote to reject requiring a federal study on the impacts of eliminating the New Source Review (NSR) program under the Clean Air Act. An amendment by Senator John Edwards (D-NC) to the omnibus appropriations bill would have delayed implementation of changes to the NSR program until the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) could complete a study.
“While we are disappointed that the Senate did not adopt the Edwards amendment, we commend those 46 Senators who voted to delay changes in the NSR program until the impact of exempting power plants and other industrial facilities from air pollution controls could be studied,” said Environmental Defense legislative director Elizabeth Thompson. “Had the votes of those senators who were absent been added to the total in favor of the amendment, this could have very well been a tie vote. Today’s outcome also signals that environmental issues are going to receive close scrutiny in this session of Congress.”
Among those supporting the effort to delay the NSR rollback were senators McCain (R-AZ), Mikulski (D-MD), Snow (R-ME), Sununu (R-NH), Durbin (D-IL), Byrd (D-WV) and Bayh (D-IN). Among those voting against the measure were Senators Breaux (D-LA), Fitzgerald (R-IL), Smith (R-OR), Lincoln (D-AR) and Pryor (D-AR).
“We congratulate those Senators who voted in favor of protecting the environment and public health,” Thompson said. “Senators who voted against allowing the nation’s top scientists to study the impact of changing the Clean Air Act should be prepared to explain their decision to constituents back home.”
Air quality protections under the “new source review” program have historically required power plants, refineries, steel mills, chemical plants and other large industrial sources that lack modern pollution control systems to update their pollution reduction technology when they take action that significantly increases air pollution. On November 22, 2002 the Bush Administration put forward a policy that stripped away the NSR requirement, a Clean Air Act program that has been instrumental in protecting the health of Americans and local air quality for 25 years.
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Latest press releases
-
Trump Administration’s Reckless Attack on California Clean Vehicle Safeguards Would Mean More Pollution, Death and Disease, Higher Costs
March 12, 2026 -
New York Legislature Proposes $1 Billion for Cost-saving Clean Energy and Resilience Programs for the Second Year in a Row
March 10, 2026 -
Washington State, California and Québec Release Draft Agreement to Link Cap-and-Invest Programs
March 3, 2026 -
Public Interest Groups Go to Court to Halt Trump Administration Order to Keep Washington’s Last Coal Plant Operating
March 3, 2026 -
U.S. Judge rules New York’s congestion pricing program can continue
March 3, 2026 -
Environmental Defense Fund announces first grantees in SRM research program
March 2, 2026