Contact:
Jennifer Andreassen, 202-572-3387, jandreassen@edf.org
(Washington – October 17, 2012) The European Union’s program to
cut global warming pollution, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), has
driven significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and sparked
innovation in low-carbon processes at much lower-than-expected cost, according
to a new report by
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). The report comes
just as the EU ETS is concluding five years of full operation and transitioning
to its next phase, which runs from 2013-2020.
EDF policy and economics experts concluded in The EU
Emissions Trading System: Results and Lessons Learned
that while a more ambitious reduction target for EU emissions in 2020 or 2030
is necessary to achieve the EU’s long-term goals, the EU’s Emissions Trading
System has driven significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions – even
during periods of growth in Europe’s gross domestic product.
“What we found very clearly is that after a three-year trial
period and almost five years of full operation, the world’s first global
warming cap-and-trade program is doing exactly what the EU designed it to do – cut
dangerous emissions, spur the deployment of low-carbon innovation, and do so at
low cost,” said EDF Attorney and report co-author Alex Hanafi.
The EU ETS applies to 40% of the total greenhouse gas emissions of
the 30 participating countries. Additional sectors will come under the cap in
January 2013.
“While many people are acutely aware of the global recession,
Europe’s struggling economy, and today’s low market prices for EU emission
allowances, we found that there is another reality that is less well-known:
despite some initial challenges, the EU Emissions Trading System is
successfully reducing the EU’s global warming pollution, and offers real
lessons to other countries and states seeking to decouple economic growth from
emissions growth,” said Hanafi.
EDF highlighted six major results from the EU ETS since its start
in 2005:
- The EU ETS has achieved significant emission
reductions at minimal cost.
- Although over-allocation of emission allowances and a
sharp drop in their prices occurred during the program’s pilot phase (2005-7),
the policy stability created by longer-term targets subsequently led to durable
investments in reducing emissions and deploying low-carbon strategies.
- Windfall profits occurred in some member states, but
can be avoided using a variety of policy tools.
- Reforms have improved the elements of the EU ETS that
allow emitters to tender credits earned from projects reducing emissions in
developing countries (“offsets”), but further reforms would be useful.
- The EU ETS has made significant progress in preventing
any recurrence of the tax fraud and theft of allowances that occurred during
the program’s early years.
- Companies and entrepreneurs have responded to the ETS
and its complementary policies with a diverse range of profitable investments
in low-carbon solutions.
As the first large-scale CO2 cap-and-trade system, the
EU ETS presents a unique learning experience for other regions, nations,
states, and even local jurisdictions considering carbon-trading systems – including California, whose own cap-and-trade law launches Jan. 1, 2013.
“Lessons from the EU’s Emissions Trading System have relevance all
over the world and nowhere more so than in California, where regulators and
policy makers have been working hard to proactively adapt to the challenges
revealed by the EU’s early years of implementation” said Derek Walker, EDF’s California-based Director of Strategic Climate
Initiatives. “The bottom line is that emissions trading has been an economic
and environmental success in the EU and it will be in California too.”
Additional
resources:
# # #
Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org), a leading national nonprofit organization, creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. EDF links science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships. Connect with us on Twitter and Facebook.