Documents and publications archive
- Air quality in the Southeast is among the worst in the nation, threatening human health, the environment, and the long-term economic viability of this
- 2008 report reveals critical gaps in our public health system's ability to respond to growing health threats from climate change.
- Massive quantities of antibiotics are added to the feed used in raising chickens, hogs and beef cattle, which helps spur the development of antibiotic
- 2008 report identifies U.S. companies making chemicals that Europe classifies as dangerous.
- Fact sheets of economic and health benefits by state.
- 2007 EDF report provided—for the first time—a comprehensive comparison of the European Union's new REACH regulation with existing policies in the Unit
- EDF identifies the top 25 emitters of mercury from the electric sector.
- More than a year and a half after it was supposed to be completed, the voluntary federal program to deliver hazard data on the most widely used chemic
- Determining how many HPV Challenge program chemicals continue to be manufactured at HPV levels but remain unsponsored is complicated for a variety o
- As the HPV Challenge Program passes its halfway mark, this status report examines the significant progress to date, and also identifies several trends
- EDF mission, goals, new directions for our work, and core capabilities for 2010-2014.
- Through 16 selected projects, this map illustrates just some of the positive economic returns from transit investment around the country.
- Recommendations for specific policy actionsto ensure that our transportation investments deliver the best results for the environment and the economy.
- What consumers need to know about the smart grid and smart meters Type: Fact Sheet
Date: July 25, 2011
By making smart investments in a "smart" green grid, we can enable significantly greater use of clean, renewable energy, non-polluting electric vehicl - Statement of Dr. Richard A. Denison before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science concerning environmental and safety impacts of nanot
- Letter to Senate and House Appropriations Committees signed by 14 organizations, including large and small businesses as well as environmental groups,
- Letter to Senate and House Appropriations Committees signed by 19 organizations, including large and small businesses as well as environmental groups,
- Supplemental testimony submitted to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science for a hearing on "Environmental and Safety Impacts of Nanot
- Statement of Richard Denison before the U.S. House of Representatives at a hearing on research on environmental and safety impacts of nanotechnology.
- Letter from Environmental Defense to U.S. EPA addressing the Toxic Substances Control Act and nanotechnology issues.
Subscribe by RSS