Prop. 65 Kit: Published Reports

Posted: 15-Dec-2001; Updated: 13-Feb-2006

• California Spurs Reformulated Products [PDF], Wall Street Journal, p. B1 (11/1/90).
• California Uses 'Legal Judo' on Toxics [PDF], Washington Post, p. A3 (07/30/91).
• Prop. 65 Succeeded in Reducing Toxins [PDF], San Jose Mercury-News (1/18/92).
• California's Prop 65: Lessons for the National Risk Debate [PDF], Risk Policy Report, pp. 40-41 (1/20/95).
• California Has Successful Model of Regulatory Risk Assessment [PDF], David Roe and Omenn Op-Ed, Seattle Post-Intelligencer (7/25/95).
• An Opening for Environmentalists [PDF], Mathews Op-Ed, Washington Post (4/15/96).
• Prop 65's Non-toxic Legacy [PDF], Sacramento Bee, Forum Section, p. 1 (11/30/97).
• Regulation by Shaming, (subscription required) Atlantic Monthly (04/00).
• Proposition 65 Comes of Age, Chemical Week, p.36 (4/07/99).

• Calcium Supplements [PDF]
• Diesel Exhaust [PDF]
• Dishes [PDF]
• Lead-brass Faucets [PDF]
• Lead-brass Pumps [PDF]
• Paint Stripper
• Spot remover
• White-out Fluid [PDF]

• Totten, Controversial Proposition 65 Provokes Industry Outrage, 'Quiet Compliance' as It Marks Second Anniversary as Law [PDF], Chemical Regulation Reporter, pp. 169-174 (5/05/89).
• Kizer et al., Sound Science in the Implementation of Public Policy: A Case Report on California's Proposition 65 [PDF], JAMA, pp. 951-955 (8/19/88).
• Roe, An Incentive-Conscious Approach to Toxic Chemical Controls [PDF], Economic Development Quarterly, pp. 179-187 (8/89).
• Rechtschaffen, How to Reduce Lead Exposure with One Simple Statute: The Experience of Proposition 65 [PDF], Environmental Law Reporter, pp. 10581-10591 (10/99).

Return to the Prop. 65 Kit Main Menu